Analysis of responses to Q21. Q21 was designed to directly ascertain from worship pastors their perception of what they most often convey about God through their worship services. I would contend that most worship pastors want to convey all of God’s attributes over time in their worship planning. In addition, the response bank is necessarily limited and the attributes arbitrarily paired. Also, what pastors think they convey may or may not be congruent with actual practice, a potential topic for future research but outside of the purview of this research. Nevertheless, the data from this question provide noteworthy insight into the perceived portrait of God that worship pastors believe they are painting each Sunday.
Table 13 represents the characteristics of God provided in the response choices to Q21 and is divided into a column of transcendent characteristics and a column of immanent characteristics.
Figure 18 indicates that conveying God’s greatness and glory was selected by 44% of worship pastors as the portrait of God that they most often communicate through their worship planning. God’s grace and mercy and God’s sovereignty and majesty follow at 16.7% and 10.5%, respectively. Figure 18 also demonstrates an interestingly low percentage of conveying God’s holiness (6.6%), a significant focus of Scripture necessarily foundational to a full understanding of the gospel. Also of special note is the nonexistence of the category of separateness and distinction by any worship pastor as the top choice for what he or she most often conveys about God. The data indicate that worship pastors see God’s separateness and distinction neither as an important aspect of God’s greatness and glory nor as an important means of conveying God’s greatness and glory. Worship pastors appear to shy away from the terms “separateness and distinction.”
If indeed, as I have contended, we are in an age of immanence, such a result would be expected. On this question the data support the assertion. (Many thanks to Cody Libolt for helping me to shape this conclusion.)
A somewhat different picture emerges when the most, 2nd most, and 3rd most often data points are considered in the aggregate. Representing what worship pastors most often convey about God, Figure 19 shows a virtual tie between God’s grace and mercy (immanence) and God’s greatness and glory (transcendence) with God’s faithfulness following in third place. God’s transcendent qualities of omnipotence, eternality, separateness, and distinction are negligible.
Adding all composite percentages together, conveying God’s immanence receives a total composite score of 171.6 percentage points while conveying God’s transcendence receives a total composite score of 127.3 percentage points. The 44.3-point variance would indicate a stronger propensity for worship pastors to represent God in his immanent nearness rather than his transcendent distinction.